Thursday, July 24, 2008

These pretzels are making me thirsty!!!

The general equilibrium theory proves - and this is the principle of free market economy - that when each individual maximize his and only his own utility, then the economy will reach prices that will lead it to an equilibrium which is efficient. The exact terminology is "Pareto Efficiency", which means that it is not possible for one individual in the economy to be better-off without causing any other individual to be worse-off...

Ok, so let's be honest with all these stuff. First of all, the theory is based on very specific assumptions, which we don't know for sure if they take place in the real world - such as assuming that our preferences are convex sets... how can I know if my preferences are a convex set? Well, actually that is not such a crazy assumption, but it does not matter now. This is not the point of this post.

The point of this blog is, that we usually meet people all the time in the streets, which are of course maximizing only and only their own utility, and totally ignoring the utility of others... and I am certain that this is not leading to any efficiency whatsoever. During the past two weeks I have experienced some of these situations, and those people are so dumb that their actions deserve to be spread around the world through my blog so that you can join me in thinking how dumb they really are...

The first situation was while driving to the Hebrew University in Agron St. in Jerusalem. There were two jeeps each on one lane, talking to each other (it seems like they were very good friends, and did not talk in a while). The street of course is two lanes wide, and there was a traffic light some meters ahead of the two jeeps. The traffic light was red, but then in turned to be green. These two individuals kept talking to each other (there were no more cars before them), while I am honking constantly behind them, letting them know that (1) the traffic light is already green and they should move on, and (2) that I am pretty upset! I was completely ignored. These guys kept talking about their wives, or their mothers (just as I did inside of my car) and just ignored me and the other cars behind of me honking. In any case, they decided to say goodbye after a minute or so of the light being green, and they accelerated in order to catch the green light. Guess what? When I reached the junction, the traffic light turned red (they actually passed in yellow). Of course, then the taxi driver behind me started yelling at me that I was not agressive enough and he blessed me by saying that I was an idiot... That also pissed me off. What was he expecting me to do?

So now that I mentioned taxi drivers, they are separate species in these kind of stories. Again, a couple of days ago, traffic light turns green, and the taxi cab does not move. That was a wider street and I could move on the side, but, why does he do that? He just doesn't care AT ALL about what is happening behind him... He just stayed there. But this thing of stopping on a green light is common down here. Once I could not pass the traffic light because a guy who was lost stopped on the green light and asked a police woman how to keep going... a police woman! Can you believe it? Then when I got stuck in the red light because of him (he did manage to pass in yellow) I asked the same police woman: "If you give tickets for crossing on red, why don't you give tickets for stopping on green?"... She just laughed and did not replied me.

Another story (I have lots of these). With my two friends M&M we were driving to Mount Scopus in Jerusalem, and at some point the road is only one lane wide, and everybody must pass through a small tunnel. That is exactly on the side of the Old City walls, and there is a space for buses to stop there so that they can drop their passengers. Well, this nice bus driver in front of us did not find a place to stop on the side, because there were many other buses, and he decided to stop in THE MIDDLE OF THE ROAD! He dropped all his 40 passengers, of course, no pressure, the rate of going out of the bus was like a 0.2 passengers/second, meaning a passanger every 5 seconds. He just ignored that there was a line of 30 cars behind him, and that maybe an ambulance could come by, or that there are other people in the world other than himself that can be in a rush and have to get on time to a meeting or class!!!

And this is related to the fact that people sometimes think that they are the only one in a hurry, and others in the world have things much less important to do than themselves. I can feel this specially when going to the doctor. While sitting in the waiting room (everybody made his appointment, and everybody is waiting for his number to be called), then always a guy suddenly comes to you and ask you if he can go before you because he is on a hurry, and he does not have time... What does he think? That I love to come everyday and sit on a waiting room just for fun? What does he want me to answer: "Well, actually I'd love to! I'd love to sit here for another two hours and wait, probably your life is more important than mine, so come over!"... This really annoys me. People really do think that others are less busy... why? That is probably because of the signal you are giving (or not giving) waiting in line. If you are sitting quietly without asking everybody else if you can step in before them, then you are giving a signal that you don't care to wait, and this might be perceived as a consequence of not being busy. But, my question is why he did not think about the fact that he would be busy at that hour when making an appointment that day at that hour?

Now, a third kind of stories. Here in Israel this is very common, or at least that is how I perceive it. You are sitting in front of the bank employee, with the doctor, with the income tax office employee or even with a lecturer (meaning that you already waited in line, and it is your turn) and then, suddenly, a third person comes along, and start talking and asking questions to the person who is receiving you. It can be in person (such as other bank employees that come and talk to the employee you are sitting with to ask him about how to do this and how to do that) or it can be by the phone (the personal phone of these people rings). So, when this happens I am expecting that they will say to their peers or other people: "Hold on sir, I am with a customer"... But no! They answer them and keep talking, and even on the phone! Can you believe it? I am just sitting there as an idiot, and these guys are talking to other people... I think this does not appear to be that annoying, but let me exemplify it. I went to arrange some things at the income tax office (this is a story by its own, coming soon) and I waited in line and I sat in front of the lady who received me. Then, I start explaining her what do I need, and she starts seeing my stuff, and it appears that I was missing one small document. Then she receives a call in her cell phone, god knows from who, but it seems like it was family or something, and she started checking this person's details on the computer (she asked him for his ID number and started to answer questions about income tax). So, I then thought to myself, what is this lady doing? Tell your cousin or your mother (I was thinking about her mother as well inside of my head) to come, wait in line and do their stuff just like I did... or if you want to help them, don't be so insolent, and do that after working hours, or when you are not receiving anyone else. Then I could not stand it and I asked her: "Lady, are you with me or what?", and she started screaming at me: "Wait sir, you don't have all your documents, and I am working, this phone call is work"... of course is work, that is exactly my complain, work, but only with people in front of you, and not with your family that is calling you to give them a hand without coming over here. Of course I shut up, and waited, like an idiot.

But these people get pretty upset when you complain about these things. Also, once in the bank I was waiting in line, and there were lots of people, and I was called and it seems like the manager was also receiving people in line to help her piers. So I sat with her, and as expected, every 2 minutes another employee of the bank came and ask her what to do, how to do it, when to do it, etc. I also told her: "I am sorry, but why can't you concentrate on me for a second, I feel it is disrespectful"... Well, she did not scream, but she told me: "Look, I do not receive people usually, and I am making you a favor that I received you now...". Why does she think she was making me a favor? Maybe she is making a favor to the other employees, but not to me. I would have prefer sitting with anybody that can do my stuff without interrupting me every 2 minutes. Moreover, if she knows that she has to assist her staff constantly, why did she start to receive people from the beginning?

In sum, these are the things in life that make you think, what the hell are they teaching me at school? Here everybody is trying to maximize his utility and, no way, this is not efficiency. But what I have learned, and sadly I agree, that in these situations one can only take a deep breath and say to yourself: "These pretzels are making me thirsty!!!"

3 comments:

  1. Maybe I don't understand because I did not study economics... but what do all these stories about people maximizing their own (and only their own) utility have to do about the market? What are the purchasing decisions? Where is the price equilibrium? Or the write-offs? You don't even know what a write-off is!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi,

    I must say that you are right in your views. This is not a market, and therefore the theory should not apply... However, I have two comments:

    (1) You can actually try to find some elements in this situation as a market, in which time for those two people standing at the traffic light probably was less costly than for me in that moment. They decided to "buy" some free time while I was not willing to. Of course, there are a million things which are not inside of the model, such as time not being a tradeable item.

    (2) This blog is not meant to be an economics class (for those who are reading this to study for their test, please stop right now!). The idea of bringing the first welfare theorem (the theorem that explains that when individuals worry about their own utility you will have an efficient allocation), is that these kind of situations can be happening also in the markets. These two guys in their jeeps probably are inside of the market, and they may behave similarly as they behaved in the streets, causing inefficiencies in the system... An answer to those peoples is regulation in the markets and they might provide an explanation of why are regulations necessaries sometimes.

    Thanks for writing,

    The Homo Economicus

    ReplyDelete
  3. Putas! acabo de descubrir estas geniales historias y te fuiste a Los Yunaistesteís.

    Marico, tenís que encontrarle un tiempo para describir tus (des)venturas en el nuevo programa. ¡Cachaí?

    Saludos desde la patria,

    Er Orge.

    ReplyDelete